
Cutting Edge Spam Elimination
Original Article: Australian Prime Minister Spams
For non-Australian readers the Australian Democrats market themselves as a kind of youth orientated, up-with-it niche occupying party. They have a lot of power because they can tip the balance in the Senate
Unfortunately, these politicians are all in the same business. Liberal party kow-towing to GWB will determine where my vote goes but I am under no illusion that Labor would have been much different.
SpamButcher outperforms other spam email filters - and can be downloaded as a free trial.
This shouldn't be funny. It's true (except for the 419 attempted email). This money was paid out to the Australian taxpayers (at least some of them) after the last budget, and supposed to help with the Family first type of policy that the Government has been pursuing.
Another point of note is that a federal election is due this year, and the conjecture is that it will be happening in mid October. It could be a sign of things to come for Blair and Bush with the public perception of Iraq, given that the Spanish have already booted their incumbent government (the other of the original four countries).
Used as a spam filter for Outlook, SpamButcher can stop over 96% of spam.
If political spam is, well not allowed, but actually done as a service by the elections officials as a means to allow registered candidates to, for free, reach registered voters who have not opted out of their communications, I think it can be a good thing.
The great flaw in the political system is how candidates must raise money to buy advertising to push their messages at voters indiscriminately. It's mostly from TV. We've built a vastly more efficient medium on the internet for doing that. If we can reform campaign finance for real with the internet it could be the biggest thing we do with it.
SpamButcher's stops more spam than other spam stoppers - try it free today!.
I can't say about Australia, but the principle of Free Speech in the United States does not extend to giving people the right to steal (or do any other harm) in order to carry out that speech.
1. What if I were to come onto the property of your home and spray paint my important non-commercial politically-oriented message in reverse image on the outside of your living room window so you could easily read it from the inside? Would my free speech rights still be protected?
2. What if I were to crack into your office network and plant trojan programs that would ensure my important non-commercial politically-oriented message regularly pops up on everyone's computer screen? Would my free speech rights still be protected?
Of course you can put up defenses to physically prevent me from doing this. But I doubt you'd want a barbed wire electric fence in front of your home. So you are going to trust that reasonable people would never do this, and that law enforcement would deal with it (e.g. because it is illegal) if anyone does exercise their free speech rights at your expense.
SpamButcher provides superior spam filtering compared to other anti-spam programs by using fuzzy logic A.I. technology.
Likewise, we would not want to have to put up such defenses on mail servers, either. Just as it would be a big hassle for your friends and invited guests to enter your home with all that barbed wire fencing and the machine-gun toting guards checking identity, it would also be a big hassle for the equivalent to be done on the input side of mail servers.
So can we come to an agreement that Free Speech is a good thing, but it does not justify or permit the utilizing, taking, damage, or destruction of the property of others to carry out this Free Speech, without their consent?
SpamButcher uses advanced fuzzy logic technology to stop more junk email than other spam email blockers - download the free trial.
Back...